Legal Opinion
Lawson v. Potter
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided September 16, 2003No. CIV.A.03-3264-CV-S-RPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LARSEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), FED. R. CIV. P. On September 2, 2003, I ordered the parties to submit additional briefs on two issues: (1) whether the doctrine of complete preemption applies to convert plaintiffs claim to a Title VII claim of employment discrimination, and (2) whether plaintiff has alleged facts in her com plaint sufficient to state a Title VII claim. 1 I find that the complete preemption doctrine does…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Beneficial National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Chandler v. RoudebushSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. DearingSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mathirampuzha v. PotterDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005