Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. City of Parshall

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1961No. 7844PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROY K. REDETZKE, District Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the trial court granting the relief prayed for in the plaintiffs’ complaint, wherein the plaintiffs sought to have a contract entered into between the City of Parshall, North Dakota, and the defendant Larson and Teigen Construction Company declared illegal and void. The contract was made and entered into by and between the parties on May 12, 1958, wherein the said defendant company agreed to furnish certain materials and construct street improvements, including storm drainage, curbs and gutters in the said City of Parshall.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Collins v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  2. Certain Lots Upon Which Taxes Are Delinquent v. Town of MonticelloSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  3. Kalamazoo Municipal Utilities Ass'n v. City of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Pickton v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Baker v. Lake City Sewer DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. HL Munn Lumber Company v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  2. Julian v. Mayor, Councilmen and CitizensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Mini Mart, Inc. v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. City of Salisbury v. NagelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Lee v. WalstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API