Legal Opinion
Burr v. Policy Holders Life Ins. Assn.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 9, 1933No. Docket No. 4705PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, J., pro tem.
The statement of the question involved is given by appellant thus: “The main question agitated upon this appeal involves the doctrine of warranties as applied to the statements and representations made by an applicant for membership in a Mutual Benefit Association organized and operating under the provisions of 452-a of the Civil Code of California.”
The contention is that the insured in her application for insurance asserted statements as to her health and bodily condition which were in fact absolute and strict warranties as to matters about which she was making…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Maine Benefit Ass'n v. ParksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
3Cited by5 opinions
- Turner v. Redwood Mutual Life Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- American National Insurance v. HerreraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Wills v. Policy Holders Life Insurance Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. v. MathisenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Soc. v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1944