Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1993No. 20S03-9307-CR-741PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

In this trial for attempted murder, the court failed to instruct the jury that it must find the defendant intended to kill the vice-tim. The Court of Appeals affirmed, notwithstanding our decision in Spradlin v. State (1991), Ind., 569 N.E.2d 948. We grant transfer and reverse.

When applying Indiana's general attempt statute, Ind.Code Ann. § 385-41-5-1 (West 1986), we have emphasized that mere intent to take a certain action is not by itself sufficient to sustain a criminal conviction. The State must also prove that the defendant intended to commit the crime. See…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Spradlin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Zickefoose v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Santana v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Hill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Lowery v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Clark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Richeson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Echols v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Simmons v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API