Daane v. Lovell
Michigan Court of Appeals
1DissentD. E. Holbrook, J.
This writer respectfully disagrees with the result required by the opinion of the majority in this case. The reasons for this dissent appear in the following opinion.
The instant appeal involves an action by the plaintiff-appellant, Homer Daane, guardian of his ward, Mrs. Bertha E. Lehto, for the rescission of a deed from her to her niece, Angela Lovell, defendant-appellee. The trial court denied relief to the plaintiff, and plaintiff has appealed as of right.
It is necessary to relate the facts as they appear to this writer from the record which shows that Bertha E. Lehto arid her husband,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Allore v. JewellSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Kar v. HoganMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Van't Hof v. JemisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Seeley v. PriceMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Beattie v. BowerMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.