Haselden v. Hamer
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Wilson, J., Dillon, November, 1914; Rice, J., Action by J. D. Haselden against W. M. Hamer. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion on a former appeal, 97 S. C. 178, 81 S. E. 424, and in the Circuit decree by Judge Rice, as follows : In 1904, the plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement for the exchange and sale between them of certain properties, real and personal.
Read the full summary
Before Wilson, J., Dillon, November, 1914; Rice, J., Action by J. D. Haselden against W. M. Hamer. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion on a former appeal, 97 S. C. 178, 81 S. E. 424, and in the Circuit decree by Judge Rice, as follows : In 1904, the plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement for the exchange and sale between them of certain properties, real and personal. Haselden was to convey to Hamer certain farm lands, and deliver to him certain personal property, and in consideration therefor, Flamer was to turn over to Haselden…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Fraser.
This is a second appeal. The first is to be found in 97 S. C. 178, 81 S. E. 424.
The respondent in his argument says;
“This was originally an action instituted by the plaintiff against the defendant: (1) For an accounting; (2) for an order enjoining the defendant from interfering with plaintiff’s possession of a certain house and lot; (3) for an order requiring defendant, upon payment by plaintiff of the amount found due by him, to transfer to plaintiff the stock ■mentioned in the complaint (mill stock) which had been pledged to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Adams Express Co. v. Allendale Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1914
- Haselden v. HamerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- Haselden v. HamerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918