Haselden v. Hamer
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Memminger, J., Dillon, Fall term, 1917. Action by J. D. Haselden against W. M. Hamer. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. cite: As to the refusal of the presiding Judge to grant continuance desired by the plaintiff: 97 S. C. 178; 81 S. E. 424; Ency. of PI. and Prac, vol.
Read the full summary
Before Memminger, J., Dillon, Fall term, 1917. Action by J. D. Haselden against W. M. Hamer. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. cite: As to the refusal of the presiding Judge to grant continuance desired by the plaintiff: 97 S. C. 178; 81 S. E. 424; Ency. of PI. and Prac, vol. I, p. .87. As to master’s order appointing an expert accountamt: 89 S. C. 398; 58 S. C. 495; 49 S. C. 423. submit: Motions for continuance are in the discretion of the Judge and, are not appealable: 90 S. C. 470; 93 S. C. 412; 26 S. C. 518; 18 S. C. 601; 62 S. C. —; 15 S. C 614; 41 S. C. 548; 87 S. C. 152;…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Fraser.
This is the third appeal in this case. The former cases will be found in 97 S. C. 178, 81 S. E. 424, and 107 S. C. 164, 92 S. E. 387.
It is sufficient here to say this Court held in 97 S. C. that Mr. Haselden owed Mr. Hamer a debt, and that Mr. Hamer held certain securities of Mr. Haselden as security for debt; that Mr. Hamer had received dividends on the securities, and sent the case back in order that an accounting might be had between the parties. This accounting was not had, and in 107 S. C. the case was again sent back for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Haselden v. HamerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
- Haselden v. HamerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917