Legal Opinion
Danner v. United States
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided April 26, 2002No. CS-01-0143-JLQPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
QUACKENBUSH, Senior District Judge.
Before the court is the United States’ Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (C.R.30), which was heard without oral argument on April 23, 2002. Plaintiffs Dennis J. Danner and Pamela O. Danner are proceeding pro se. Defendant United States of America is represented by Frederick S. Wermuth, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division.
For the following reasons, the Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED.
Background and Procedural History
This case involves a $500 tax…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sego v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
- Brampton Woolen Co. v. FieldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932
- Peerless Woolen Mills v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
3Cited by5 opinions
- Callahan v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2008
- Quigley v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- (PS) Bevan v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Callahan v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2008
- Dudley Joseph Callahan and Myrna Dupuy Callahan v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2008