Legal Opinion

Peerless Woolen Mills v. Rose

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 31, 1928No. 5256PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

This suit was brought by appellant to enjoin appellee, as collector of internal revenue, from proceeding to sell some of its property which he had levied upon under a warrant of distraint against it to enforce collection of income and excess profit taxes for the fiscal year ending June 36, 1919.

On September 15, 1919, appellant filed a return under section 361 of the Revenue Aet of 1918 (46 Stat. 1689), showing a tax liability of $116,636.58, but attached to this return a letter claiming that the tax should be calculated under sections 327 and 328 of that act, in order…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Frank Erickson and Amelia Erickson v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Ohio Steel Foundry Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  3. Ventura Consolidated Oil Fields v. RoganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  4. Babetta Schmidt v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  5. Kearney v. A'HearnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API