Legal Opinion

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Turner

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 27, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The writ of error here is taken to an order granting a new trial after a directed verdict in favor of the defendant. The trial court having taken the ease from the .jury by directing a verdict appears afterward to have concluded that under the circumstances existing he should not have done so and, therefore, granted a new trial.

We cannot say from an inspection of the testimony in the record, that the trial court was clearly in error in so ruling. When the question of negligence is to be determined upon a state of facts on which reasonable men may fairly arrive at different conclusions, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ruff v. Georgia, Southern & Florida Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1914
  2. Southern Express Co. v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  3. Teston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  4. Carney v. StringfellowSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  5. Consumers Electric Light & Street Railroad v. PryorSupreme Court of Florida · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Miami v. BoppSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  2. Klich, Et Ux. v. Miami Land Development Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API