Legal Opinion

Klich, Et Ux. v. Miami Land Development Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 21, 1939PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, P. J.

The Writ, of Error was taken to an order granting a new trial after a directed verdict for defendants, as alleged by Section 4615 (2905) C. G. L. See Powell v. Jackson Grain Co., 134 Fla. 596, 184 So. 492; L. & N. R. Co. v. Wade, 49 Fla. 179, 38 So. 49; F. E. C. R. Co. v. Turner, 103 Fla. 300, 137 So. 255.

“On writ of error taken under the statute to an order granting a new trial in a civil action at law, the only-questions to be considered are those involved in the order granting a new trial.” H. N. 12, Ruff v. G. S. & F. Ry. Co., 67 Fla. 226, 64 So. 782.

In an action of ejectment brought by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ruff v. Georgia, Southern & Florida Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1914
  2. Sloan v. SloanSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
  3. Florida Finance Co. v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  4. Day v. Benesh Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WadeSupreme Court of Florida · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. NORTH RIDGE GEN. HOSPITAL, INC. v. City of Oakland ParkSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Beaty v. Inlet Beach, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1942
  3. Lurie v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
  4. City of Ocoee v. BownessSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  5. Smith v. AyresSupreme Court of Florida · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API