Legal Opinion

Diane Renee Gilmore, Claimant v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided January 18, 2019No. 18-cv-256-SMPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Diane Renee Gilmore, Claimant v. Case No. 18-cv-256-SM Opinion No.

2019 DNH 015

Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant O R D E R Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), claimant, Diane Renee Gilmore, moves to reverse or vacate the Acting Commissioner’s decision denying her application for Supplemental Security Income Benefits under Title XVI of the Act,

42 U.S.C. §§ 1381

- 1383(c). The Acting Commissioner objects and moves for an order affirming her decision. For the reasons discussed below, claimant’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Tina M. Raymond, Claimant v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, DefendantDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
Raymond v. US Social Security Administration, Acting CommissionerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020