Legal Opinion

Tina M. Raymond, Claimant v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided January 10, 2020No. 19-cv-097-SMPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Tina M. Raymond, Claimant v. Case No. 19-cv-097-SM Opinion No.

2019 DNH 007

Andrew Saul, 1 Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant O R D E R Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), claimant, Tina Raymond, moves to reverse or vacate the Commissioner’s decision denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (the “Act”). See 42 U.S.C. § 423. The Commissioner objects and moves for an order affirming his decision. For the reasons discussed, claimant’s motion is denied, and the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Raymond v. US Social Security Administration, Acting CommissionerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API