Sechrist v. Bowman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Maxey,
On February 24, 1909, the ancestor of the appellees sold to the appellants all the fire clay, consisting of three or more separate veins, underlying a farm of 76 acres, except two blocks containing 14 acres and two acres respectively, together with complete mining rights and release of damages resulting to the surface from the mining and removal of the clay. The total1 consideration was $2,000 for the 60 acres of clay and for four acres of land besides.
The appellants in operating the clay mine, crossed the boundary line and removed some of the reserved clay.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rabe v. Shoenberger Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Hendler v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Trustees of the Proprietors v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Laureldale Cemetery Co. v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Trustees of the Proprietors v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Frankel v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
- Pennsylvania Department of General Services v. United States Mineral Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Empire Properties, Inc. v. Equireal, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Estate of CreaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- City of Philadelphia v. Nationwide InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.