Legal Opinion

Morton v. Tullgren

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 13, 1978No. 77-241PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

Appellants Richard F. Morton and Elizabeth J. Morton were held liable to appellees for an alleged violation of the Arkansas Securities Act. Each of the appellees purchased an interest, represented by a certificate of participation, in a limited partnership known as “Mountain Homes I,” for which they paid $12,000. The limited partnership was formed to develop two mobile home parks and two large residential subdivisions. There were two general partners, Venture Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, and Mountain Home Investment Corporation, an Arkansas…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Blocher v. HarlowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. McCrater v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Steele v. GannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. Wilson v. New Mexico Lumber & Timber Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Dean v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Trinity Broadcasting Corp. v. Leeco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Johnson v. LillySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. HenkelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Homemakers, Inc. v. GonzalesSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  5. Sullivan v. EdensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API