Johnson v. Lilly
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
This court has accepted appellate jurisdiction of this case to decide whether Act 870 of 1991, which enlarges the statute of limitation for enforcement of child support obligations, can be applied retroactively to revive a claim that had been barred. We hold that the chancellor erred in retroactively applying the enlarged limitation to revive a barred cause of action. The appellant assigns two other points on appeal, but we cannot decide them because we have not been provided a sufficient record.
At the outset we confront the defect in the record. The appellee mother,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Rhodes v. CannonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston v. York, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
- Morton v. TullgrenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Clemmons v. Office of Child Support EnforcementSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Kelly v. MarcantonioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Jenkins v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Hunt v. RileySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Chunn v. D'AgostinoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.