Legal Opinion

New York Consolidated Railroad v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The action was brought to recover the balance of the cost of certain construction work done by one of plaintiff’s predecessor companies upon the terminals of the New York and Brooklyn bridge. The complaint alleged that the work was done under a contract entered into by the bridge commissioner. It provided that said predecessor of the plaintiff was to contribute $110,000 towards the cost, and that the defendant was to pay the balance. This balance is alleged as $55,086.33. The answer denied knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to certain allegations; others it denied upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knowles v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Rochkind v. PerlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. Schinzel v. BestNew York Supreme Court · 1904
  4. City of New York v. . Brooklyn City R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Schinzel v. BestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API