Legal Opinion
Schinzel v. Best
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1904PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Demurrer to complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtMaddox, J.
The great and immediate need of the traveling public for reasonable railroad transit and traffic facilities over the Williamsburgh bridge may now be and for a long time past must have been fully appreciated, but that can have no consideration or influence in determining this controversy, as to the legality of the contract in question, however pronounced the demand for relief from congested travel conditions and for the full and complete use and enjoyment of that structure as a public thoroughfare may be, and further comment or discussion along that line can serve no good purpose here,' and is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Syracuse Water Co. v. . City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Knowles v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- New York Mail & Newspaper Transportation Co. v. SheaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Starin v. . EdsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of New York v. . Brooklyn City R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- People ex rel. Bridge Operating Co. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- In re New York Railways Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Hendrickson v. CallanNew York Supreme Court · 1911
- New York Consolidated Railroad v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.