Taffner v. Arkansas Department of Human Services
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPaul E. Danielson, Justice
I agree with the majority’s holdings on the issues in this case with the exception of the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel. I would reverse the circuit court’s order terminating parental rights and remand this case , to the circuit court for a new adjudication hearing.
In Jones v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 361 Ark. 164, 205 S.W.3d 778 (2005), this court held that, as a matter of law, the right to counsel in parental-termination |2ncases includes the right to. effective counsel. We adopted the standard set forth by.the United States Supreme Court in Strickland v.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jones v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Anderson v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011