Legal Opinion

Stengel v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 2005No. 2004-SC-000305-KB, 2004-SC-000332-KB, 2004-SC-000336-KB, 2004-SC-000347-KB, 2004-SC-000357-KB, 2004-SC-000349-KB, 2004-SC-000350-KB, 2004-SC-000346-KB, 2004-SC-000339-KBPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LAMBERT, Chief Justice.

On or about, April 15, 2004, Movants, the Honorable R. David Stengel (STENGEL), Richard Boling (BOLING), Barry Bertram (BERTRAM), Roy K. Snell (SNELL), Raymond M. Larson (LARSON), George Moore (MOORE), Kenton R. Smith (SMITH), Irv Maze (MAZE) (seven Commonwealths Attorneys and one County Attorney) and the Kentucky Medical Association (KMA), filed motions under SCR 3.530(5) for review of Ethics Opinion E^23 (OPINION) adopted by the Kentucky Bar Association (KBA) Board of Governors in January 2004 and published in the March 2004 issue of the Kentucky…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  5. United States v. John Joseph Barone, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Com. of Ky. v. CambronCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2018
  2. Megibow v. KENTUCKY BAR ASS'NKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Julie Muth Goodman v. Jason Nemes, in His Official Capacity as Chair of the House of Representatives Impeachment CommitteeKentucky Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API