Marriage of Crampton v. Crampton

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Julia Crampton appeals denial of her motion to continue an eight year spousal maintenance obligation created in a 1975 dissolution decree. She contends the continuation is required due to changed circumstances of the parties. She claims that the trial court particularly erred in failing to rely on increased earnings of respondent to justify a further maintenance obligation. Finally, she appeals denial of her request for attorney fees in the motion proceedings. We affirm.

FACTS

This provision for spousal maintenance was included in the 1975 decree which dissolved the…