Legal Opinion

Lackey v. Olds & Stoller Inter-Exchange

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 18, 1927No. Docket No. 4851PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.

An automobile owned by Morris Levenstadt was being operated by Nat Levenstadt, his chauffeur, who happened to be his nephew, where by the negligence of Nat Levenstadt in operating said automobile August E. Buelke was killed.

Nat Levenstadt, at the time of the accident, was alone in the automobile and on the way to purchase clothing for himself.

The defendant had issued a policy of insurance to Morris Levenstadt, and an action was brought against said Morris Levenstadt and Nat Levenstadt for damages for the death of Buelke, because of the negligence of Nat Levenstadt, and judgment was rendered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Buelke v. LevenstadtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wolford v. WolfordKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Behringer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Klatt v. ZeraWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Easterly v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Fazzino v. Insurance Co. of North Amer.California Court of Appeal · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API