Allison, Bailey & Co. v. Phœnix Insurance
Texas Supreme Court
Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Third District, in a case appealed from Williamson County. The opinion contains a statement.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWA, Associate Justice.
For the purpose of deciding the question presented, the following is a sufficient statement of the case:
The plaintiffs in error and 8. A. Allison constituted a copartnership for the purpose of carrying on a gin business, under the firm name of Allison, Bailey & Co. The firm bought machinery from the Keating Implement Company of Dallas to the amount of $2900, and executed two firm notes, each for $1450, payable, one due December 1,1888, and the other December 1, 1889. The machinery was placed in a house owned by the firm, situated on land belonging to and the homestead…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance of California v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Thompson v. CartwrightTexas Supreme Court · 1846
- McMillan v. CroftTexas Supreme Court · 1847
- Collins v. Panhandle National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
- Knight v. HollomanTexas Supreme Court · 1851
3Cited by23 opinions
- Russell v. People's Nat. Bank of BeltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Mauritz v. SchwindCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. W. C. Robertson & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Neyland v. LanierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.