Legal Opinion

Elizabeth Anderson HISHON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KING & SPALDING, a Partnership, Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 17, 1982No. 80-9021PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAY, Circuit Judge:

A voluntary association of two or more persons established for the purpose of engaging in a common enterprise has traditionally been known as a partnership. It is from within this framework this Court now confronts a novel question of jurisdiction under Title VII. Elizabeth Anderson Hi-shon filed a Title VII action against King & Spalding, a law firm, alleging that it discriminated against her on the basis of sex in its refusal to invite her into its partnership. After considering lengthy and detailed memoranda, Judge Newell Edenfield of the Northern District of Georgia,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Marilyn Wheeler v. Main HurdmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  3. Richard M. Jones v. The Transohio Savings AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  4. Alan D. Fountain v. Metcalf, Zima & Company, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API