Legal Opinion

Globe, Indemnity Co. v. Granskov

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1944PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

Under Rule 3a of this court the parties to this appeal entered into a stipulation of facts, approved by the trial court. For the determination of the issues raised here it suffices to note the following facts stated in that stipulation. The judgment in question was entered in an action which Grob brought against Elmer Granskov, Ace Keeney, Ben Gilbert-son, Harry B. O’Brien, and the Globe Indemnity Company, as surety on a bond given by O’Brien as sheriff. On the trial which resulted in that judgment there was proof to the following effect. Gilbertson, who was a deputy under Sheriff O’Brien,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re CoteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
  2. In re ByrneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  3. In re LordeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1906

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peerson v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Bastian v. LeRoyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. LauermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Weil v. H. F. Haessler Hardware Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  5. In Re SporeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API