Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Lauerman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1961PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDieterich, J.

The issue on this appeal is whether the judgment entered in 1945, was based upon indebtedness created by the defalcation of the defendant while acting in a fiduciary capacity as administrator of the estate of Dan Roth, deceased. If it was, it was not discharged under the Federal Bankruptcy Act, and accordingly Lauerman is not entitled to have the judgment satisfied under sec. 270.91 (2), Stats., 11 USCA, Bankruptcy, p. 271, sec. 35, sub. (a) (4), which provides:

“(a) A discharge in bankruptcy shall release a bankrupt from all of his provable debts, whether allowable in full or in part, except…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Suring State Bank v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Globe, Indemnity Co. v. GranskovWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Klatt v. HelmingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Reagan v. PedrickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chase Lumber & Fuel Co. v. Koch (In Re Koch)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1996
  2. Bastian v. LeRoyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Ivy v. PlylerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. In Re SporeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1989
  5. WESTERN SURETY COMPANY v. ReedNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API