Legal Opinion
Glidden Co. v. Hellenic Lines, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 2, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SYLVESTER J. RYAN, Judge.
The controversy in suit arises out of a breach of four charter parties providing for carriage of ilmenite ore, which the Court of Appeals (2 Cir., 275 F.2d 253) found was not excused by the closing of the Suez Canal from November 2, 1956 to April 10, 1957; it remanded the suit to the District Court for assessment of damages. It comes to us on exceptions filed by both libelant and respondent to the report of the Commissioner appointed following the remand.
Familiarity with the opinion of the District Court (D.C., 182 F.Supp. 172) and of the Court of Appeals (2 Cir., 275…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- O'DOnnell Transp. Co., Inc. v. City of New York. The Kosciusko. The Don. The Anna F. O'DOnnellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Canadian Industrial Alcohol Co. v. Dunbar Molasses Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Glidden Company, Libelant-Appellant v. Hellenic Lines, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Luckenbach S. S. Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1919
- Trustees of Columbia University v. KalvinNew York Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- The Glidden Company, Libelant-Appellee v. Hellenic Lines, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- The Glidden Company, Libelant-Appellee v. Hellenic Lines, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963