Xpo Logistics Worldwide Government Services, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KAPLAN, Judge.
These consolidated bid protests arise out of a solicitation for a contract to provide transportation services issued by the Department of Defense, through the United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM or “the agency”). The protests were filed after the agency decided to take certain corrective action recommended by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), in response to a bid protest filed there by XPO Logistics Worldwide Government Services, LLC (XPO). GAO had recommended that USTRANSCOM reconsider its award of the contract to Crowley Logistics, Inc.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Xpo Logistics Worldwide Government Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Lifeworks Tech. Grp. LLC v. Walgreen Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Iap World Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- LifeWorks Technology Group LLC v. Walgreen Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Xpo Logistics Worldwide Government Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017