Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 16, 2004No. Record 031186PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lemons

In this appeal, we consider whether a trial judge must recuse himself from presiding over a probation revocation hearing if he was the Commonwealth’s Attorney for the jurisdiction at the time and place of the defendant’s original criminal conviction. The Court of Appeals held that recusal was mandatory under such circumstances. Jackson v. Commonwealth, 40 Va. App. 343, 579 S.E.2d 375 (2003). We disagree.

I. Facts and Proceedings Below

In 1997, pursuant to a plea agreement, Kenneth Lamont Jackson pled guilty in the Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk to two counts of possession of cocaine with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Justus v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  3. Deahl v. Winchester Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  4. Johnnie Ray Grimsley v. Ray M. Dodson, Sheriff J. Marshall Coleman, Attorney General of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  5. Green v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wilson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  2. Billips v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
  3. Walker v. ForbesSupreme Court of Virginia · 2016
  4. Jaccard v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  5. Billips v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API