Legal Opinion

United States v. Tamara Santarelli

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 5, 2019No. 16-4114; 18-1362PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RESTREPO, Circuit Judge.

Tamara Santarelli appeals the District Court's denial of her motion to amend ("Motion to Amend") her initial habeas petition. We also consider whether the petition ("Subsequent Petition") that Santarelli seeks to file in the District Court, which she annexed to the motion ("Motion to File Subsequent Petition") that she filed in this Court during the pendency of this appeal, constitutes a "second or successive" habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244 and 2255(h). For the reasons that follow, we hold that the allegations contained in Santarelli's Motion to Amend "relate…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. United States v. Omar FolkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  2. Frederick Coleman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
  3. Anthony Mungin v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
  4. Rivers v. GuerreroSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
  5. Alexander Balbuena v. William SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API