Witham v. United States
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE BRIAN SCOTT WITHAM, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Nos.: 3:20-CV-277-TAV-DCP ) 3:15-CR-177-TAV-DCP-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner has filed a pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under
28 U.S.C. § 2255
[Doc. 1].1 The government filed a response in opposition [Doc. 6], and petitioner filed a reply [Doc. 9]. Based on the record before the Court, it plainly appears that petitioner is not entitled to relief; therefore, it is not necessary to hold an evidentiary hearing.2…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.