Legal Opinion
McCloud v. Potter
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Decided May 10, 2007No. Civil Action 06-0216-BH-CPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAND, Senior District Judge.
This action is before on defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doe. 27), as to which the plaintiff has failed to timely respond. For the reasons stated in the separate Order entered this day (Doc. 37), the Court concludes that the facts set forth in the defendant’s motion are undisputed and that the defendant is entitled to a judgment in his favor as a matter of law.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Introduction
1. Kim R. McCloud, an African-American female, filed suit against John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (“Defendant” or “USPS”) on April 6,…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Anderson v. Dunbar Armored, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009