Piatt v. Hubbell
Ohio Supreme Court
This was a suit in chancery to set aside certain proceedings in partition. , It came before the court upon bill, answers, exhibits, and depositions, and was adjourned here for decision from the ■ county of Hamilton. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Lane
delivered the opinion of the court:
The plaintiffs are the widow and the owners of four distributive shares of the estate of W. Perry, late of Cincinnati. The defendants are the owners of the remaining share of said estate. William Perry died seized of a block of lots in Cincinnati, a partition of which is the main object of the present bill.
A partition is resisted by the defendants, because they say a partition is already made. In 1814, all the heirs of William Perry united in presenting a petition for partition to the common pleas, of these premises. Mrs. Ferguson and the two…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Wildey v. Bonney's LesseeMississippi Supreme Court · 1856
- McGill v. RoushOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Daniel v. City of New Orleans, Page & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1874
- Harvey v. RuschSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
- Mathes v. NisslerMontana Supreme Court · 1895