McGill v. Roush
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Fain, Judge.
Defendants-appellants, Ivan Leo Roush, Beatrice Roush, Riley W. Roush, and Betty Roush, appeal from a decision ordering a judicial sale of land owned in common with the plaintiff-appellees Ned and Martha McGill.
We conclude that there is no evidence to support the trial court’s finding that the commissioners understood and fulfilled their statutory duty to make partition, and that the commissioners failed, in any event, to provide the trial court with a factual basis for their conclusion that the land could not be partitioned without manifest injury to its value.
I
Appellees Ned and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gay v. ParpartSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Logue v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
- Rothert v. RothertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Black v. Sylvania Producing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1922
- Zacek v. ZacekOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McCarthy v. LippittOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- Platt v. PlattWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Thrasher v. WattsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Simon v. UnderwoodOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Piros v. TeagueOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.