Legal Opinion

People v. French

California Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1902No. Crim. No. 917PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Appellant, French, with two other defendants, was informed against for the crime of grand larceny by stealing certain cattle in Trinity County and afterwards driving them into Mendocino County and there selling them. French had a separate trial, and was found guilty. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying motion for a new trial.

Defendant asked and was refused an instruction, numbered nine, that “evidence of good character is evidence relevant to the question of guilty or not guilty, and is to he considered by you in connection with the other facts, ’…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. AsheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  2. People v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  3. People v. DoggettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. People v. ShepardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  5. People v. CaseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. State v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  5. People v. FranksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API