Legal Opinion

Taxicab Drivers' Local Union No. 889 v. Cunningham

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 22, 1957No. 37019Published

1Per curiam

This is one of a series of actions arising out of a controversy between members of a labor union. The facts out of which this action arose are more fully set forth in our opinion in case No. 37021, Taxicab Driver’s Local Union No. 889, etc. v. Pittman, Okl., 322 P.2d 159. Inasmuch as the history of the controversy up to and including the filing of disciplinary charges in the Local Union against this plaintiff is identical with that in No. 37021 and Taxicab Drivers’ Local Union No. 889, etc. v. Pittman, Okl., 322 P.2d 153, No. 37020, we will not repeat it here.

When disciplinary action was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cason v. Glass Bottle Blowers Assn.California Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Taxicab Drivers' Local Union No. 889 v. PittmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Midco Oil Corp. v. HullSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Washington Local Lodge No. 104 of the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers v. International Brotherhood of BoilermakersWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Johnson v. International of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local Union No. 971Nevada Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API