Exxon Corp. v. Utah State Tax Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PARRISH, Justice:
INTRODUCTION
{1 This case comes to us after several related prior decisions in which we determined the proper valuation method for the oil and gas severance tax in Utah. We also previously determined the seope of the application of this new method. In this case, we hold that the valuation method announced in our prior cases should apply retroactively to all of ExxonMobil's refund requests before the Utah State Tax Commission.
BACKGROUND
T2 The original controversy over severance tax valuation began when ExxonMobil, a company created by the merger of Mobil Corporation and Exxon,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rio Algom Corp. v. San Juan CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- King v. Industrial Com'n of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
- Loyal Order of Moose, 259 v. County Board of Equalization of Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Van Dyke v. ChappellUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Questar Pipeline Co. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Olsen v. LABOR COM'NCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
- PCVI v. Premsrirut and Brown BrownCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026