Legal Opinion
W.L. Miller Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 16, 1993No. Nos. 92-1850, 92-1885 and 92-2080PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.
This case is before us again after the National Labor Relations Board ordered W.L. Miller Company to give back pay to individuals who would have been hired at hiring halls had Miller complied with its collective bargaining agreement. Miller petitioned for review and argues that the remedy imposed is beyond that encompassed in our earlier decision, National Labor Relations Board v. W.L. Miller Co., 871 F.2d 745 (8th Cir.1989) {Miller I). The union, Eastern Missouri Laborer’s District Council also petitioned for review, arguing that the hiring hall remedy ordered…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- International Union of Mine, Mill & Smelter Workers, Locals Nos. 15, 17, 107, 108 & 111 v. Eagle-Picher Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Southwestern Steel & Supply, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Service Employees International Union Local 250, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, and E. H. Limited D/B/A Earringhouse Imports, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board v. W.L. Miller Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
3Cited by2 opinions
- Morningstar Blackhorse v. United States of America, United States Postal Service; Dale West, Jr.; Susan “Suzie” Yarbro; Michael King; and Yet-To-Be-Identified Co-Conspirators and/or Other Liable IndividualsDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2026
- W.L. Miller Company v. National Labor Relations Board, Eastern Missouri Laborers District Council v. National Labor Relations Board, W.L. Miller Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993