Legal Opinion

Starr v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 6, 1936No. 3931-3933PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Circuit Judge.

In the year 1929 the officers of Sharp & Dohme, a Maryland corporation, which had been incorporated in 1926, decided on and carried out a plan of reorganization the general purpose of which was to sell to the outside public a large interest in the business and decrease the relative holdings in the company of the persons who held at that time its total capital of 90,000 shares of non-par value common stock. They caused to be formed, pursuant to this plan, a new corporation of the same name, which agreed to take over the assets and assume the liabilities of the old…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. General Utilities & Operating Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Helvering v. Minnesota Tea Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. John A. Nelson Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Chisholm v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. John Factor v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. Portland Oil Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  3. Helvering v. Elkhorn Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Gilmore's EstateCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  5. Farr v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API