Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Gilmore's Estate

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 28, 1942No. 7937-7943PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

Under § 112(b) (3) of the Revenue Act of 1934, 1 under which this litigation arises, no gain or loss is recognized “if stock or securities in a corporation a party to a reorganization are, in pursuance of the plan of reorganization, exchanged solely for stock or securities in such corporation or in another corporation a party to the reorganization.” One of the given definitions of a “reorganization” is a “statutory merger or consolidation”. 2 This appeal presents two questions: first, whether the transaction, hereinafter described, between a holding company and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Minnesota Tea Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Helvering v. Alabama Asphaltic Limestone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Helvering v. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  5. United States v. HendlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  2. Lewis v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
  3. Survaunt v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
  4. Southwest Natural Gas Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  5. Apt v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1950

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API