Legal Opinion

Neah Bay Fish Co. v. Krummel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1940No. 27625PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

Neah Bay Fish Company and Neah Bay Dock Company, both Washington corporations, and W. W. Washburn, Jr., and Walter E. Baker, co-partners doing business as LaPush Ocean Beach Resort, conducting business solely within the Makah Indian reservation under authority and license from the United States commissioner of Indian affairs and the Makah tribe of Indians, instituted separate actions to enjoin the collection of the Washington state business and occupation tax (Laws of 1933, chapter 191, p. 869, and amendments) and sales tax (Laws of 1935, chapter 180, p. 706, and amendments) for business done…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harkness v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Langford v. MonteithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Concessions Co. v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. United States v. StahlU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas · 1868

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In RE WESLEY v. SchnecklothWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Wesley v. SchnecklothWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Bennett v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Ford v. IQ Data International IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
  5. Municipal Ass'n of South Carolina v. Service Ins.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API