Legal Opinion · Dissent

Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Wesley v. Schneckloth

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1959No. 34127Published

1DissentHill, J.

(dissenting)—The majority states the facts accurately and clearly. Its opinion is predicated on the federal decisions: In re Carmen, 165 F. Supp. 942 (September, 1958), and Dickson v. Carmen, No. 16185, 270 F. (2d) 809 (C.A. 9th; September 29, 1959). In the face of these decisions I am impelled to a different conclusion, realizing fully that whoever may be right the federal courts have the muscles, so far as the opening of prison doors is concerned.

The state of Washington, since its creation, has had territorial jurisdiction over all persons within its boundaries, unless restricted by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Waley v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. United States v. McBratneySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. United States v. McGowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. New York Ex Rel. Ray v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API