Legal Opinion

City of Grand Forks v. Barendt

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2018No. 20180227PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEvers, Justice.

[¶ 1] The City of Grand Forks appeals a district court order suppressing the results of Thomas Barendt's chemical breath test after the City charged Barendt with actual physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. We affirm, concluding North Dakota's implied consent advisory must be read after placing an individual under arrest and before the administration of a chemical test.

*736 I

[¶ 2] According to the facts as agreed to by the parties, in October 2017, while conducting a welfare check in Grand Forks, Officer Luke Wentz observed Barendt slumped over in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. O'ConnorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Zajac v. Traill County Water Resource DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Broeckel v. MooreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. NgaleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Bismarck v. VagtsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. MaylandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. VetterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. City of Grand Forks v. BarendtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. City of Grand Forks v. BarendtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API