People v. Brayton
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, P. J.
*736Defendant enters a department store and removes the price tags from two items for sale worth slightly over $100. She then tells store personnel she previously purchased the items and is returning them for a refund. She uses another person's driver's license to falsely identify herself. Defendant eventually pleads guilty to identity theft, a felony.
We conclude defendant is eligible for relief under Proposition 47.
Kara Taylor Brayton appeals an order denying her "motion" for resentencing under Proposition 47, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act. ( Pen. Code, § 1170.18.)1 She previously pled…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. RomanowskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Jimenez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. GarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. JimenezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- People v. Weir, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Chatman, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. ChatmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- People v. WeirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.