Legal Opinion

People v. Brayton

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided July 31, 2018No. 2d Crim. No. B284408PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, P. J.

*736Defendant enters a department store and removes the price tags from two items for sale worth slightly over $100. She then tells store personnel she previously purchased the items and is returning them for a refund. She uses another person's driver's license to falsely identify herself. Defendant eventually pleads guilty to identity theft, a felony.

We conclude defendant is eligible for relief under Proposition 47.

Kara Taylor Brayton appeals an order denying her "motion" for resentencing under Proposition 47, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act. ( Pen. Code, § 1170.18.)1 She previously pled…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. RomanowskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. People v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. Jimenez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. People v. GarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. JimenezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  2. People v. Weir, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. People v. Chatman, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. People v. ChatmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. People v. WeirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API