Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1989No. B034545PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, J.

The County of Los Angeles, the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County, Richard Dixon, Chief Administrative Officer of Los Angeles County, Mark Bloodgood, Auditor-Controller of Los Angeles County, the Municipal Court of the Los Angeles Judicial District, and its court administrator, Edward Kritzman (collectively referred to as County) appeal from a judgment granting issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate directing County to distribute to the City of Los Angeles (City), pursuant to Penal Code section 1463,192 percent of the moneys collected by the Municipal Court of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. County of Sacramento v. LacknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Dieckmann v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. North Am. Title Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Opinion No. (1998), California Attorney General Reports1998
  5. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API