Legal Opinion

State v. Foster

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 5, 1991No. 88-694; CA A63119PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The issue in this case is whether the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD), ORS 135.775, applies to a Washington inmate who requested that he be brought to trial within 180 days on charges pending against him in Oregon but was parolled before the end of the period. IAD provides, among other things, a means by which a prisoner in one state may secure trial on charges that have been lodged against him in another state. The relevant portion, Article 111(a), provides:

“Whenever a person has entered upon a term of imprisonment in a penal or correctional institution of a party state, and whenever…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dunaway v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Cunningham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Womble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  5. Danielson v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API