Legal Opinion

Ward v. Isbill

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from special term, Kings county. Action by Frank P. Ward against Charles Isbill and others to foreclose a mortgage. There was a judgment in favor of defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment rendered against him in an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage upon real property. The material facts are these: On the 29th day of January, 1875, James Carson Brevoort made his promissory note in writing for $5,520.87, payable 30 days after demand to Wingfield G. Burton. Such demand of payment was made on the same day, and the note became due on the 3d day of March, 1875. On the 17th day of May, 1877, the maker of the note, Brevoort, made and executed to the payee, Burton, a mortgage upon real property as collateral security for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wood v. . ChapinNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  2. Jackson ex dem. Hudson v. AlexanderNew York Supreme Court · 1808
  3. Griffith v. GriffithNew York Court of Chancery · 1841

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hood v. WebsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Ochenkowski v. DunajAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. Smith v. Pure Strain Farms Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  4. Weideman v. ZielinskaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  5. Jefferson v. BangsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API