First National Bank v. Jagger
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Plaintiff brought this action in the district court for Bock county, to recover the amount ($282.90) of two drafts drawn by it upon defendants, which the latter had refused to pay. The complaint sets, out the agreement mentioned in the opinion. At the trial, before Perkins, J., the plaintiff had a verdict for the full amount of its claim.. A new trial was refused, and the defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
The material questions in dispute in this cas& were matters of fact, which were settled in plaintiff’s favor by the verdict of the jury. In the year 1886 the defendants were dealing in flaxseed in this state, but resided in Burlington, Iowa. One Patter- , son was their agent for purchasing seed at Luverne, in this state, where the plaintiff bank is located. Chiefly for convenience in transacting the business at that place, and in making payments for seed purchased by Patterson in the vicinity, of producers or local dealers, the defendants, in August, 1886, entered into an agreement with the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Larson v. Le MereSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Hamel v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Murray v. NickersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- McDonough v. Hennepin County Catholic Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Walters v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.