Legal Opinion

Rhyne v. Gammil

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1952No. 38472PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

Pursuant to prior negotiations, appellants purchased from appellee the business known as The Major Chemical Company. Upon the ground that the financial condition of the business was not as had been represented, appellants filed their bill praying in the alternative for rescission, reformation or for a money decree based upon the difference between the amount of accounts payable as represented and as later disclosed. At the close of complainants ’ testimony, a motion to exclude the evidence was granted and the bill dismissed. Prom this decree the appeal is taken.

(Hn 1) We therefore take the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Partee v. PeppleMississippi Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Bullard v. Citizens' Nat. BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Stanton v. CoxMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Hastings-Stout Co. v. J. L. Walker & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Breeland v. Hide-A-Way Lake, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. McMullan v. Geosouthern Energy Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Watson Laboratories, Inc. v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Misso v. National Bank of CommerceMississippi Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Lloyd Ford Company v. SharpMississippi Supreme Court · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API