Commonwealth v. Rhodes
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
On behalf of the Commonwealth, a ballistics expert from the firearms identification section of the Department of Public Safety, Lieutenant James T. McGuinness, testified that the weapon which the defendant has been charged with unlawfully carrying (G. L. c. 269, § 10[a]) “could not be fired.” The unlawful carrying statute speaks of a firearm as defined in G. L. c. 140, § 121. The latter statute, as amended through St. 1983, c. 516, § 1, describes as a firearm a weapon “from which a shot or bullet can be discharged.” As matters were left at the close of the Commonwealth’s evidence, the handgun…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FancyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Commonwealth v. SeayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. BartholomewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Commonwealth v. SampsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Commonwealth v. DunphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. NievesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. MunizMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Commonwealth v. RaedyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Commonwealth v. ButtimerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Jackson v. ClarkeDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2019